<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anonymous Vs Scientology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://markiddon.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/anonymous-vs-scientology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://markiddon.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/anonymous-vs-scientology/</link>
	<description>This blog is a melting pot for my findings in the world of Multiplatform media production.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 06:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous &#171; The Multiplatform Game</title>
		<link>http://markiddon.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/anonymous-vs-scientology/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous &#171; The Multiplatform Game</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 16:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markiddon.wordpress.com/?p=28#comment-85</guid>
		<description>[...] Caught Mark&#8217;s interest - he&#8217;s got the rest of the videos on Multiplatform Monkey.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Caught Mark&#8217;s interest - he&#8217;s got the rest of the videos on Multiplatform Monkey.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trippenbach</title>
		<link>http://markiddon.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/anonymous-vs-scientology/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>trippenbach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markiddon.wordpress.com/?p=28#comment-52</guid>
		<description>The problem with all this is that it's got a lot of mob rule . . . Attacking Scientology is one thing, but who designates the targets? Who's going to protect my eccentric special interest group when Anonymous turns on them?

Or is it just "tough luck kid, you should toe the line?"

As viral ad campaign, interesting. As political development, disturbing. You can motivate huge crowds very quickly with this technology. And we all know how reliable the wisdom of crowds is in the wake of a major shock like 7/7 . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with all this is that it&#8217;s got a lot of mob rule . . . Attacking Scientology is one thing, but who designates the targets? Who&#8217;s going to protect my eccentric special interest group when Anonymous turns on them?</p>
<p>Or is it just &#8220;tough luck kid, you should toe the line?&#8221;</p>
<p>As viral ad campaign, interesting. As political development, disturbing. You can motivate huge crowds very quickly with this technology. And we all know how reliable the wisdom of crowds is in the wake of a major shock like 7/7 . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
